翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ War of The Roses (boxing)
・ War of the Roses (disambiguation)
・ War of the Roses (radio show)
・ War of the Roses (video game)
・ War of the Satellites
・ War of the Second Coalition
・ War of the Sicilian Vespers
・ War of the Sixth Coalition
・ War of the Sons of Light Against the Sons of Darkness
・ War of the Spanish Succession
・ War of the Spider Queen
・ War of the Succession of Champagne
・ War of the Succession of Landshut
・ War of the Succession of Stettin
・ War of the Supremes
War of the Theatres
・ War of the Third Coalition
・ War of the Three Henries (977–978)
・ War of the Three Henrys
・ War of the Three Sanchos
・ War of the Thuringian Succession
・ War of the Twins
・ War of the Two Brothers
・ War of the Two Capitals
・ War of the Two Peters
・ War of the Vikings
・ War of the Whiskers
・ War of the Wizards
・ War of the Wizards (gamebook)
・ War of the Worlds '15


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

War of the Theatres : ウィキペディア英語版
War of the Theatres
The War of the Theatres is the name commonly applied to a controversy from the later Elizabethan theatre; Thomas Dekker termed it the ''Poetomachia''.
Because of an actual ban on satire in prose and verse publications in 1599 (the so-called Bishops' Ban of 1599), the satirical urge had no other remaining outlet than the stage. The resulting controversy, which unfolded between 1599 and 1602, involved the playwright Ben Jonson on one side and his rivals John Marston and Thomas Dekker (with Thomas Middleton as an ancillary combatant) on the other. The role Shakespeare played in the conflict, if any, has long been a topic of dispute among scholars.
The least disputed facts of the matter yield a schema like this:
# In his play ''Histriomastix'' (1599), Marston satirized Jonson’s pride through the character Chrisoganus.
# Jonson responded by satirizing Marstons's wordy style in ''Every Man out of His Humour'' (1599), a play acted by the Lord Chamberlain's Men. (Note: the order of these first two events has been questioned by James Bednarz, who argues that "(a) ''Histriomastix'' was deliberately launched in the final weeks of 1599 to serve as a critique of Jonson's first "comicall satire" ''Every Man Out'', and that (b) Jonson's disparagement of ''Histriomastix'' in ''Every Man Out'' (III.iv.29) was subsequently added to the acting script of his already completed play, before the end of the same year, as a rejoinder to Marston's initial attack." See Bednarz, James. "Marston's Subversion of Shakespeare and Jonson: Histriomastix and the War of the Theaters." ''Medieval & Renaissance Drama in England.'' Vol. VI. New York: AMS Press, 1993. 103-28.)
# Marston, in turn, replied with ''Jack Drum's Entertainment'' (1600), a play acted by the Children of Paul's, satirizing Jonson as Brabant Senior, a cuckold.
# In ''Cynthia's Revels'' (1600), acted by the Children of the Chapel, Jonson satirizes both Marston and Dekker. The former is thought to be represented by the character Hedon, a "light voluptuous reveller," and the latter by Anaides, a "strange arrogating puff."
# Marston next attacked Jonson in ''What You Will'' (1601), a play most likely acted by the Children of Paul's.
# Jonson responded with ''The Poetaster'' (1601), by the Children of the Chapel again, in which Jonson portrays the character representing Marston as vomiting bombastic and ridiculous words he has ingested.
# Dekker completed the sequence with ''Satiromastix'' (1601), which mocks Jonson ("Horace") as an arrogant and overbearing hypocrite. The play was acted by both the Children of Paul's and the Lord Chamberlain's Men.
Apparently Jonson and Marston later came to terms and even collaborated with George Chapman on the play ''Eastward Hoe'' in 1605. That play offended King James with its anti-Scottish satire, a part apparently written by Marston. While Marston evaded capture, Jonson and Chapman ended up in jail as a result.
Shakespeare probably alludes to The War of the Theatres in a scene between Hamlet and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern:
:''Rosencrantz'': Faith, there has been much to do on both sides; and the nation holds it no sin to tar them to controversy: there was, for a while, no money bid for argument unless the poet and the player went to cuffs in the question.
:''Hamlet'': Is't possible?
:''Guildenstern'': O, there has been much throwing about of brains. (''Hamlet'' 2.2.362-9)
Scholars differ over the true nature and extent of the rivalry behind the Poetomachia. Some have seen it as a competition between theatre companies rather than individual writers, though this is a minority view. It has even been suggested that the playwrights involved had no serious rivalry and even admired each other, and that the "War" was a self-promotional publicity stunt, a "planned ... quarrel to advertise each other as literary figures and for profit."〔W. L. Halstead, summarised in Logan and Smith, p. 13.〕 Most critics see the Poetomachia as a mixture of personal rivalries and serious artistic concerns—"a vehicle for aggressively expressing differences...in literary theory...() basic philosophical debate on the status of literary and dramatic authorship."〔James Bednarz, quoted in Hirschfeld, p. 26.〕
==Notes==


抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「War of the Theatres」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.